Monday, June 2, 2014

We're Teaching Music the Wrong Way

In my past year as a professional musician, performing 9 to 12 hours a week, I've come to the conclusion that most American piano teachers have it backwards.  Even I -- was teaching my piano students the wrong way for 15 years.  I had a hunch that this was the case, but my experience of the past year has confirmed my suspicions.  The fact is -- reading classical notation slows people down and it's not for everyone!  A child should never learn to read music before they have learned to first listen and speak the language of music.

This classical method of teaching students to read notation at the first or second lesson is just dead wrong!  Millions have learned that they're not smart enough to play music without the crutch of sheet music.  They've been taught to rely on a set of instructions and to dismiss the power of their ears and musical intuition.  They've been taught to read alphabet letters but not to see the musical words (chords), sentences (phrases), and paragraphs (sections/form) of a song.  They've been taught to decode notes but they play with such anxiety over making a mistake that they speak those notes in an emotionless monotone. 

Music lessons/ piano lessons can only prepare students to be professionals if they first start with first training the ears and the creative mind.  The learning of spoken language starts with the ears.  What comes first with a human baby?  First, babies must spend a year or two listening to the language.  Only then are they ready to speak the language.  Then, babies aren't typically able to read the language for another few years.  Learning music, which is also a language, should follow the same sequence:  listening first, then speaking the language of music, and finally, reading and writing that language.  

Why are American piano teachers doing it backwards, insisting that children read notes at the first lesson?  We have it wrong because we've been following the script of those beginner piano books as if they were gospel, rather than trusting our own intuition about how to teach music.  

We need to delay the reading of traditional staff notation until the ear has learned to hear what a perfect fifth sounds like, what a one chord going to a four chord sounds like, and how to sing a song in numbers.  Music students must learn to be creative and improvise right away; from the first lesson.  They need to understand chords and scales before they read anything.  

We need to be able to make music without a sheet of paper, in an intuitive and joyous manner first!   And then, when a joyful and intuitive musical ear has been developed, introduce the reading of notation. Though I have fought through blood, sweat, and tears to master the tortuous task of sight reading in our classical notation system (and I am a pretty good classical sight-reader), I have found that there is a better way; a system to learning and playing songs on the piano that is more intuitive, faster, and produces more awareness of the structure of music.  

I have also come to the conclusion that immediate memorization of the "structural map" of a piece can yield rapid results in the learning of a piece, and yield immediate memorization.  This system relies on the power of the human mind and imagination rather than a piece of paper.  

Gone are the days of spending months on a difficult classical piece!  And forget about laboring over a difficult arrangement of a pop piece.  In the next few posts, I hope to show you some videos if how this rapid learning system works.  I'm excited to share this with you, so stay tuned to my next few posts.  

Friday, February 14, 2014

My Pre-Performance Rituals

What are your pre-performance rituals?  I have found that certain rituals result in a better performance for me.  What are they?
  • Trim nails.  Nails that are just the slightest bit long throw me off.
  • Take a nap - especially before night gigs.  Hands-down, this is one of the best thinks you can do to sharpen your mind.
  • Get a full night's sleep the night before, if at all possible.
  • Have a cup of coffee 30 - 60 minutes before your performance.  I always have a cup of coffee before performance.  It gives me a little edge on my focus and alertness, but not too much.  There is a pianist who swears by 5 shots of espresso before his performances.  I have to look him up, but will edit this post later to tell you who this is.
  • Eat.  Don't ever play on an empty stomach.  Ideally, don't over-eat, because this can cause a blood sugar crash later on.  I keep almonds, yogurt, bananas, etc, with me on my gigs to keep a steady supply of blood sugar.
  • Protein helps.  If I have a morning gig, I alway do better with eggs!  I like ideally like to have a steak or red meat before evening performances, but concert pianist Vladimir Horowitz always had fish.  Fruits and vegetables are great too, but don't forgo your protein.
But there's more to a successful performance than ritual.  Most importantly, make sure you let go of all fear and play from love.  Love your music as you play it!  Listen to the sounds you're creating.  Listen to the soul of the instrument as it sings and the savor the gentleness of your tone.  Go slow and easy.  Wait for your focus to peak and your tension to ease completely before you go for that run. Let go of all inhibition and move to the music however you like; however you feel.  Enjoy yourself and stay focused.  

Top 10 Love Song Requests for the Piano Player

The pianist can take two love birds down memory lane and help them remember their nuptials or celebrate their love.  I spent 2012 - 2013 playing for a lot of weddings and anniversary parties where I did just that.  Then I became the living room (lobby) pianist for Salamander Resort & Spa.  Young and old, many couples choose the resort to celebrate their anniversary or just enjoy a romantic getaway.  Couples often come over and request a song from their wedding; perhaps the song from their first dance.  This means that love songs are a staple of my repertoire.  It's so wonderful to look up from my playing and see couples embracing and smiling as I play, often swaying to the music.  Once I had an older couple get up and start dancing to "All I Ask Of You" from Phantom of the Opera.  There was no one else around at the moment, and it's not really a danceable song, but they didn't care!

I hear that reservations at the resort are at an all-time high this Valentines weekend, so I'm expecting a lot of requests.  I generally expect requests for love songs sung by Frank Sinatra, Barbara Streisand, Etta James, Billy Holiday, Harry Connick, Jr, Celine Dion, and Michael Buble.  If I don't know the song, I download it to my musicnotes.com library on my iPad and play it for them.  It costs me a couple of bucks, but it's permanently in my collection and I can print it or read the music straight from my iPad at any time.  Here are the most-requested love songs:

  •  As Time Goes By (from Casablanca) - Herman Hupfeld
  • At Last - (sung by Etta James and many others) - Harry Warren/ Mack Gordon
  • It Had to Be You - (from Casablanca and When Harry Met Sally) - Isham Jones and Gus Kahn
  • My Funny Valentine (from Babes in Arms) - Rodgers and Hart
  • The Shadow of Your Smile  (Love Theme from "The Sandpiper") - Webster and Mandel
  • Quiet Nights of Quiet Stars (also known as Corcovado) - Antonio Jobim
  • They Say It's Wonderful (from Annie Get Your Gun) - Iving Berlin
  • I've Got You Under My Skin (from Born to Dance) - Cole Porter
  • All I Ask of You (from Phantom of the Opera) - Andrea Lloyd Webber
  • My Heart Will Go On (from Titanic) - James Horner and Will Jennings (sung by Celine Dion)
It's kind of  interesting to note that most of these songs come from Broadway musicals or classic movies.  I'd love to have your input on the above list.  What are your favorite love songs?

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Autobiography: The Long Road

I was cleaning up my website today when I came across this autobiographical nugget I wrote in 2006 upon the eve of my concert at The Sheila C. Johnson Performing Arts Center.  I had completely forgotten that I wrote this.  It has important information about my formative years.
____________________________________________________________
Jennifer Warren-Baker, age 10 or 11?


















The Long Road
originally published on www.musicbyjennifer.net in 2006

By Jennifer Warren-Baker

This is not the story a child prodigy.  Quite the opposite, I was an average piano student who struggled to read the notes on the page.  In fact, the only awards I ever won were for spelling bees, writing contests, and drama.  But my piano teachers recognized my good ear and the feeling I put in my music.  This was a sign of things to come.

I grew up in the intellectually rich and affluent suburbs of Washington, DC.  My close proximity to the city ensured that a plentiful amount of cultural events were just a Metro ride away.  As a young child, I listened to my mother play out of Broadway piano books.  She was an amateur pianist, and her greatest hits list included Camelot, Sound of Music, Dance of the Rosebuds, and Tennessee Waltz.  My parents took me to outdoor jazz concerts and played lots of movie music and Motown in the home. While mom played her Broadway and sang it to me at night, Dad cranked out recordings of his African-American favorites, including Otis Redding, The Four Tops, The Supremes and the Temptations. And then there was the orchestral music of Superman and Star Wars.  From a home environment that favored the jazzy, upbeat flavor of Motown and Broadway, the traditional, Methodist church service was another world musically.  In church I heard everything from classical organ and vocal music to bell choirs and Bach.

I suppose these earliest musical influences led me to beg for piano lessons.  I wanted to play like my mother and make that music with my own fingers.  For reasons unbeknownst to me, I was drawn to music.  After teaching myself to read music, my wish for lessons was finally granted.

When my skills were adequate to study the classics, I learned Mozart, Beethoven, Bach, Schumann, and others.  My teacher was not to keen about expanding my horizons beyond the insular world of classical music, and this may have resulted in the gradual decline of my practice habits.  On a hunch, she bought me a book of Scott Joplin rags, and I was immediately hooked.  I clearly had a knack for it, and classical was soon on the back burner.  For a while, I just played ragtime and composed.  It was clear to my teacher that I didn't fit the "mold" and I was not following the course of her ideal student.

With about six years of piano lessons under my belt, my mother said I wasn't practicing what I was supposed to, so she wasn't paying.  In reality, I was busy composing my own fabulous stuff and my teacher didn't know how to deal with a creative soul.  I was fifteen.  That departure marked a painful break from formal instruction that I greatly regret.  I went on to compose and teach myself new pieces until college.

In college, I tried to bury my musical ability.  I convinced myself that I could never make a living at music, but the truth was, I was miserable without the piano.  Although I chose English as a major, I spent every hour I could in the practice rooms of the music department.  I played all the time, often composing new piano material.  After dabbling in several non-commital majors and wasting a lot of time in two different schools, I married a man who gave me the encouragement I needed to get back on track with music.  With his encouragement, I enrolled in the music program at George Mason University.

My five-year hiatus from formal instruction meant that I had a lot of catching up to do,  but I kept reminding myself that I was not marketable without theory knowledge and good sight-reading skills.  Much to the surprise of my professors, I stuck to my guns and worked hard to refine my classical skills.  Once again, I didn't fit the mold, but I did what I had to do.  To my relief, the faculty allowed me play one of my original piano compositions at each jury and recital, provided that the full score was in their possession.  Composing piano music is still my first love, and I regularly perform my compositions in public.

After receiving a music degree that many termed "useless," I decided to try my hand at teaching piano,  more to make a living than to fulfill a divine calling.  Let's just say that the teaching worked out.  It became my life's work and mission, with the benefit that I had a darned good time doing it.  I still love teaching my 50 students, all of whom bless me every day with entertaining anecdotes about the trials of middle-school dating.  My five-year old student, Libby, shocked me with her mature conclusion that "Every Good Boy Does Fine" is sexist. For those who don't know, this is a sentence that helps musicians remember that the order of the line notes in the treble clef are E-G-B-D-F.  I think she's absolutely right, so we made up the sentence, "Every Girl Better Dress Fancy."  Although our new sentence favors the female gender, I'm not sure that the dress code will meet the approval of the feminists. [The writer wishes to interject here that she quit teaching in late 2013.  See "Why I Quit Teaching."]

While maintaining a large roster of piano students, I moonlighted with numerous musical theater groups and church gigs, where my appreciation for song and lyrics suddenly blossomed.  The day the Twin Towers collapsed, I found myself alone at the piano in mourning.  In tears, I wrote my first song titled "Why Do We Wait?" A year later, my husband had a pulmonary embolism that nearly killed him.  While he was in the hospital, I wrote another song titled "It's Not My Time To Go."  Although I'm not sure these were my best songs, they marked the beginning of a new direction in my composing.

The next few years resulted in a few more serious ballads, and then I began to try my hand at comedic material.  I had played several funny characters in plays during my formative years, and had briefly written a humor column for my college newspaper.  So comedy was a natural development in my songs.  Serious and comedic, I write from life, and from my experience of the many twists and turns that a woman encounters in today's world.

I expect some controversy over my lyrics, but they are my own voice, and as an artist, I must speak for those who cannot.  I hope that for some, my lyrics are more than entertainment.  Perhaps some can see their own life in my songs and feel reassurance that they are not alone.  There is a mutual pain that all women feel at some point in their lives, and perhaps my songs might help some women (and men) work through their pain, and even laugh about their trials.

___________________________________________
Maybe someday soon I'll get the courage again to share my musical comedy and not-just-piano songs.  

Monday, February 10, 2014

Recorded Accompaniment and the Extinction of Live Musicians

Live musicians and accompanists may be an endangered species.  Why?  Many theater and music programs, due to budget constraints or other reasons, are trading in their live accompanists and musicians for pre-recorded accompaniment tracks.  The increasing availability of recorded musical theater accompaniment tracks makes this a cheap and easy option for a theater director who wants to put more money into a fancy set and costumes.  A local school near me is using recorded tracks instead of an accompanist this year, after several years of using accompanists.  Several local churches are increasingly using recorded tracks with their choirs. Even the Red Hot Chili Peppers admitted to using a pre-recorded track at the Superbowl this year!  It seems that recordings are all the rage.  We have the technology, and the sound equipment, so why not?  We can give everyone a perfect performance and fake it, or lip-sync, although I don't think I could fake it on my piano.  So what's the problem with all this recording madness?

The problem is that it's not real!  

I think our technology has made superficiality comfortable to us.  In our virtual, hyper-edited realities on Facebook, Youtube, and TV, we are ok with fakeness.  We project falsely perfect worlds in our electronic media, making everyone think that perfect is the only way to be.  Does this have anything to do with the fact that depression has reached epidemic levels in our country?  I think so.  Back when I taught piano, my students were so used to hearing perfect, edited recordings on the radio, they couldn't be satisfied with their performance unless it had the same degree of flawlessness.  I had to keep reminding them that all that stuff they hear on the radio is not a real performance, but the result of many, many takes and many hours of studio time.  But that is another rant for another day. 

Back on track.  It's time take the megaphone and give my loud and brazen opinion on the matter:  
LIVE MUSIC IS ALWAYS BETTER!  Canned music always degrades the performance.  It also gives the audience the message that music must be absolutely perfect, or it's not good enough.  And it gives the accompanist who is sometimes replaced with a recorded track that he or she it not good enough. 
In the 13 years I've been a musical theater accompanist, I've been lucky to work with several directors who understand the value of a live accompanist or pit band.  This has helped me to stay gainfully employed as I utilize my piano skills.  Here is why accompanists or a live band are more desirable in performance:
  1. Live music is impressive and more exciting.  It has the wow factor that recordings don't.
  2. Trained musicians need employment!  Yes, we need to work!  Don't replace us with recordings!
  3. A live accompanist or pit band can slow down or speed up with a singer who is not on tempo.
  4. A live accompanist can transpose with a transposing keyboard if the key is too high/ low for the singer.
  5. A live accompanist or pit band can skip ahead and find the singer when s/he skips a few bars.  This does happen, and a pre-recorded accompaniment can spell disaster in these instances.  
  6. There is no substitute for the human factor, and the energy and feeling that a live band or accompanist projects.
  7. A singer can decide to spontaneously hold a note extra long for impact/ expression, and the musicians can adjust.  This adds an extra element of freshness that recordings don't have.  Each performance is unique and is not controlled by the timing of the track.
  8. In theater, the time it takes to accomplish action or dialogue sometimes varies, and musicians can lengthen or shorten musical underscoring where needed. 
I do invite your comments on the matter.  Chime in!

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Embellishment in Music - Good or Bad?

A woman rushes over to the piano tonight when I'm playing at Salamander Resort & Spa.  I soon learn that I am playing her favorite piece, a bossa nova jazz piece called "Corcovado (Quiet Nights of Quiet Stars)" by Antonio Jobim.  She says she just started her piano lessons, and this is the song she's learning (her choice).  She notices I'm playing from sheet music but throwing in a lot of musical "bling," as I call it (extra runs and arpeggios).  She says it's beautiful, but seems intrigued with my method.
"You mean you're just making it up on the spot like that?" 
"Yes, that's what I do," I reply.  
I make up my interpretation on the spot.  I add tons of notes that aren't written, but I stay in the chord.  I have a sketch in my mind (I even put notes on my leadsheets), but I try to make it a little different each time I play it.  This is what jazz is, people.  And a lot of it is not planned!  Why do I embellish?  Two reasons:
1.  Because sometimes the arranger who arranged that version of the song you're playing wasn't that creative.  You see, s/he probably had to dumb down the song to boost sales to a market of average pianists.  If you play a piece like this exactly as written, the piece will often sound empty and dull.  In all honesty, I prefer a lead sheet with no left hand written out.  That leaves me to complete creative liberty, and I can also showcase my advanced technique by adding some runs, tricks, and arpeggios.  I can thicken harmonies, change chords, change registers, or just add more texture by changing the left-hand accompaniment pattern.
2.  Because it keeps your performance fresh if you incorporate new, spontaneous ideas with each performance of the piece.  And this captures people's hearts.  (I believe that you play with more feeling when you're making it up as you go along.)
But guess what?  A lot of musicians are scared to death to experiment with embellishment.  They have been programmed from the first lesson to play EXACTLY WHAT'S ON THE PAGE, NOTE FOR NOTE.

But isn't that like following a script?  Or being controlled by a piece of paper?  Who wants their art to be completely controlled by a piece of paper?  Not me!  It's just too rigid for an artist.

Now I should speak up in defense of classical music.  I do play exactly the notes on the page when I am playing Beethoven and Chopin -- as it should be.  For classical pieces, your interpretation does not take the form of adding extra notes.  You can experiment with tempo variations, dynamics, and articulation, but adding extra notes insults the composer.  I am a composer, so I get this.  But for jazz and popular, the invitation is wide open to interpret and arrange that piece however you want to.  How do people react to my creative arrangements?  Most people, by and large, love it.  Many want copies of my arrangments. However, you do have those uptight squares who say stuff like:
"I like it played exactly like it's supposed to be.  Look, there you go again, [as I'm embellishing].  You probably can't help yourself, can you?" (actually quote from a listener)
This same individual told me that Stephen Sondheim can't write music, so I basically dismissed his comments. Of course, I adore Sondheim's edgy Broadway hits.  I can't take it personally when someone makes a dig at my style.  I won't change who I am as an artist because one person dislikes my style.

 

Little Mermaid Musical Hits the Presses!

Read All About It!

Thanks to the Blue Ridge Leader for providing some great coverage of our upcoming show (2 articles).

 Blue Ridge Leader, February 5, 2014


Blue Ridge Leader, February 5, 2014